OUR DIANETICS STATEMENTS

Our Dianetics Statements

Our Dianetics Statements

Blog Article

The Ultimate Guide To Dianetics


I could not ever before not want to get anything that enters your mind for you- if it was otherwise, I would not be sitting below with you, doing this. I not just can never have a problem, or not intend to hear something that comes to mind for you, yet I'm totally anxious to understand every concept, every idea, every picture or feeling that arises or manifests for you- don't ever before believe or else, and if somehow you do, please simply allow me know! In some cases, you may have an idea, and photo, idea or occurrence pop up that does not seem to address the concern, or connect to it, but nonetheless, always do tell me about it, and as we proceed, the importance will certainly arise for you.


This is fundamental in the basis of processing, and the subject of this discussion: the standard functions of the counselor and the client: The basic duty of the counselor is, in contrast to "standard training", not to control, which implies to implement and/or inhibit, but to instead work from the basis of EMPOWERING THE CLIENT.


DianeticsDianetics
In subjective processing, regardless of what was stated in one's training materials, the processor is not there "to manage" the customer. However, the processor exists to provide the customer the liberty and undistracted focus to procedure and express what shows up, and what shows up is what arises when the customer addresses the product that associates with their own objectives for the processing, and for their life.


Fascination About Dianetics


John Mcmasters expressed this basic truth incredibly well in among his talks on Power processing, where he describes exactly how he was asked what this "unique flair" was that he had for offering such excellent sessions; he needed to think of that for a minute, and found that it was what he had not been doing, as well as what he was doing: he wasn't evaluating, judging, computer, or actually, producing any kind of thoughts, not to mention verbal expressions, after giving the command and while waiting on the PC to finish their response to their complete satisfaction; he was, just and only, existing with the PC, and completely interested.




The function of the counselor, demonstrated; that was his "special knack". I have had my own experience which showed me this well, really beforehand in the game. In 1982, having actually recently finished my training and teaching fellowship on New Age Dianetics, I was running this on a COMPUTER, and there was a factor in the session where (being a little bit wet behind the ears not yet having several hours under my belt as a specialist auditor) the PC appeared to be "taking as well lengthy" check my blog to share anything vocally after I offered him a command.


This trick ended up being the most important contribution that John ever before made to the topic of treatment or bookkeeping (Dianetics). In my helpful hints humble point of view, it is the best contribution that anybody has actually ever made to these subjectsthe application is completely non-judgemental, non-evaluative, and lacking any type of tip, recommendations or opinion.no preconditioned program for people, or 'levels' that they must do


In Scientology we prided ourselves on not evaluating for people. All that really implied was that the auditor did not VERBALLY assess for the Computer in session.


Dianetics for Beginners


DianeticsDianetics
The Scientology Bridge is incredibly evaluative and judgmentalAt first, we chalked up the difference in outcomes to John's improvisational abilities and experience. Nevertheless, upon additional examination, certain factors pertained to lightIt was not a matter of what he WAS doing that the other professionals weren't, but instead what he WASN'T doing that they were.


Anybody that had actually ever seen John audit might not aid but discover an one-of-a-kind top quality in his auditing."The customer's fundamental duty is to be there with the objective of relocating the instructions of their spiritual objectives, and to openly and totally share and experience whatever materializes for them in addressing the concerns and implementing the guidelines in the handling.


This is something to procedure as needed. Also, individuals regularly have previous experience and/or indoctrination in auditing/processing which, in some ways, and to some levels, really misinforms them right her comment is here into perspectives, concepts and habits patterns that protect against the complete awareness of these functions, and so they will have a tendency to inhibit the expressing of what comes to mind, as in the examples given above - Dianetics. * The initial, and perhaps leading instances of mis-indoctrination bring about less than totally smooth and reliable sessions, can be discovered in specific aspects of the training regimens, or "TR's":"TR's" are typically an individual's first, or at the very least early, experience in Scientology, and while I will certainly go on to discuss what I see as the imperfections in concept and technique, nonetheless, have a tendency to be significantly therapeutic, done as they are offered (Hubbard insists that "TR's are not refining, they are training", yet factually, they are both processing AND training)


Alan Walter made similar monitorings, and boosted on these with his "Presence Processes". There is no "flunking", and no denial of the truth of this being processing. The emphasis, as it ought to be, is on experiencing the other person's visibility. All the manifestations which obtain a "fail" in doing "TR-0" are merely the being's initiatives to stand up to the various other individual's presence, and instead of being bugged and nagged with "Flunk", which enforces "failure!" on the being, one simply needs to be encouraged to "stick their feet in the water a little much deeper", to progressively restore their capacity and desire to fully share and experience "being below", or "visibility", with others.


Some Of Dianetics


DianeticsDianetics
I wait till the customer checks out me as if to say "I'm done answering, over to you, what's following?" As long as the customer is looking in other places than back at the counselor, they are still processing the inquiry or command. Bear in mind "a silent auditor welcomes itsa"; the customer is still refining, till their interest plainly returns to the therapist.

Report this page